Refuted:'Woops a Living Index Fossil!'

	Duration: 08:57 minutes Upload Time: 07-07-26 11:55:29 User: Desertphile :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: No scientist ever claimed the see-lah-kanth was a quote "missing link" unquote. No scientist claims the see-lah-kanth was intermediate between fish and amphibians. The ICR cult has been told this fact many hundreds of times and yet they still repeat their lies. Jesus in the Book of John is said to have said that Satan is the father of lies; one must logically conclude the people at the ICR cult are the sons of Satan. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbLRjqChhLw Woops a Living Index Fossil! BereanBeacon
Comments
WatchGuy7 ::: Favorites "...ess you are learning impaired." What an obvious insult! Lol, I can take your words out of context too. By the way, you don't need to quote me...I'm right here. (lol, who's he trying to fool?) Oh! You're right there! By the way, marine animals can't swim in mud which is precisely the same material which flash fossilized them. By the way, if fossilization takes millions of year, how come a fish giving birth was fossilized? 07-08-19 00:19:46 _____________________________________________________
Desertphile ::: Favorites "...ock layers as it was settling from the Flood |SIC|." "Flood?" What "flood?" These were marine animals! Sheeeish. 07-08-18 14:53:05 _____________________________________________________
Desertphile ::: Favorites "That's why it was such a good index fossil that scientists could tell they existed in that period." The extinct species is not the same as the extant one. Surely this is bloody obvious, unless you are learning impaired. 07-08-18 14:51:55 _____________________________________________________
mobiltec ::: Favorites It's a lot easier than sifting through all the lies. Besides, the questions I had in mind were more on a personal level involving your beliefs, fishing and auto mechanics. 07-08-17 16:27:36 _____________________________________________________
WatchGuy7 ::: Favorites No it didn't. You see in any rock layer this creature or creatures like it are only found in a particular layer. That's why it was such a good index fossil that scientists could tell they existed in that period. The fact they haven't found that species or sister species is because of a Creationist arguement that types of creatures will be more common in rock layers as it was settling from the Flood. You're not getting younger buddy. It's about time you wise up. 07-08-17 16:07:05 _____________________________________________________
Desertphile ::: Favorites "... how come we don't see its sister species in any of the layers above...." Different environments: didn't my video cover this already? 07-08-17 15:03:39 _____________________________________________________
Desertphile ::: Favorites "Before I ask you any questions I mu...." Why ask me questions? You have internet access and probably a library nearby: they do far better than I. 07-08-17 15:02:47 _____________________________________________________
WatchGuy7 ::: Favorites Alright...different species. Old species dies out. Makes sense yes...how come we don't see its sister species in any of the layers above? C'mon, don't these things die every 100 million years? 07-08-17 01:32:24 _____________________________________________________
mobiltec ::: Favorites Before I ask you any questions I must see your entire library of videos. Do any of your videos address faqs? If so which one(s) 07-08-17 01:10:06 _____________________________________________________
Desertphile ::: Favorites "My question is, if this fish was such a good index fossil and is now living...wouldn't you find them in any layer of rock above it? How come it isn't?" You have not understood my video. They are totally different species than the extinct ones! 07-08-16 20:07:18 _____________________________________________________